Monday, May 11, 2026

Fictional Mitfords

I’m way behind on writing about books. This is something that I wrote in 2025 and never published. I’m publishing it now so that I can include it in my 2025 book review post. God willing, I’ll finish that before the end of 2026. 

*****

My life as an American woman in God-help-me 2025 is nothing like the lives of fictional British middle- and upper-class women in the early and mid 20th century. Nor do I want it to be - I wouldn’t want to be either the victim or the beneficiary of the English class system. When it comes to repressive social hierarchies, burn them all down is my motto. 

Still, I love reading about these characters, and so British womanhood in bygone eras seems to be a dominant theme for my reading - well, that, and the state of the world in God-help-me 2025. It’s quite the contrast. I read three of Nancy Mitford’s four novels in 2025. The Pursuit of Love, Love in a Cold Climate, and Don’t Tell Alfred are the stories of the Radlett family and their lives at Alconleigh, the family’s ancestral estate, and beyond. All three are told in the first person by Fanny Logan, the Radletts’ first cousin and daughter of Lady Alconleigh’s sister, known as “the Bolter” because of her history of marrying and abandoning a series of men. 

I read them out of sequence - I started with Love in a Cold Climate and after I finished, I remembered reading that Mitford had written several Radlett novels, and I got my hands on them as quickly as possible. The Pursuit of Love was the first in the series so I read it as a prequel. Don’t Tell Alfred, which I’m in the middle of now, takes place about 20 years after the events of Love in a Cold Climate, when Fanny’s husband, a quiet Oxford don whom we don’t hear from much in the earlier novels, is appointed British Ambassador to France. All of a sudden, unassuming Fanny and cerebral Alfred are thrust into the rarefied worlds of high Paris society and international diplomacy during the Cold War. 

I’d kick like a mule if I was yanked out of my cozy life as the wife of a high-ranking academic at Oxford and thrown headlong into a world of daily parties and reporters and photographers and visiting heads of state; but after overcoming some initial trepidation, Fanny adjusts quickly and becomes interested and invested in her new role. She manages one comic crisis after another, without much help from her beautiful but flighty assistant, and keeps the Ambassador on a need-to-know basis - hence the title. But Alfred is not a fool. He knows what’s up - he just chooses what he sees and what he doesn’t see. 

*****

In the earlier books, especially The Pursuit of Love, the Radlett daughters live in a world of privilege, but not ease. Marriage is their only prospect of independence. The rules of primogeniture dictated that none of the daughters could inherit their father’s considerable wealth, and Lord Alconleigh (based on Nancy Mitford’s real-life father, Lord Redesdale) believes in the rules of primogeniture and does not believe in formal education for women. Lord Alconleigh is also a tyrant - mostly a benevolent tyrant, but a tyrant nonetheless - whose whims and preferences completely dominate the family’s life. The “Hons Cupboard” - a closet that the girls use as a retreat and clubhouse - is their only escape from Alconleigh’s strict rules and erratic discipline. Yes, the Radlett girls live in a stately home on a huge estate where they are tended by servants and never want for anything, but their lives are not their own. Fanny, the first person narrator of all of the Radlett novels, is a little wistful about her own quiet life with her Aunt Emily, compared to the riotous family togetherness of Alconleigh; but she’s also glad to return to her serene and pleasant home after long visits with the boisterous Radletts and the mercurial Uncle Matthew. 

In Love in a Cold Climate, the girls grow up and gain some independence (mostly by marrying rich men). Don’t Tell Alfred is Fanny’s story. After a lifetime as a second banana to her Radlett cousins, Fanny really comes into her own in Paris despite her initial reluctance to leave her life in Oxford. She is surrounded by beauty and elegance and luxury every moment of the day, so much so that she quite sympathizes with her predecessor who refuses to vacate the Embassy, knowing as she does that she also won’t want to leave when her time comes. But even better than the richness of her physical environment is the freedom and autonomy that she enjoys as an older woman (of course, “older” is relative - Fanny is probably about 45 in this book).  Amid the chaos of a hack journalist’s efforts to undermine the Ambassador and his wife, and her socialite secretary’s failure to do much actual work, and her predecessor’s popularity and unwanted presence in the Embassy compound, Fanny perseveres. She outwits her adversaries and becomes a person of importance in Paris. 

*****

I’ve read enough about the Mitford sisters to know that The Pursuit of Love and Love in a Cold Climate are straight-up roman a clef novels in which art imitates life very closely. Lord and Lady Alconleigh are very much like David and Sydney Freeman-Mitford aka Lord and Lady Redesdale; and Linda Radlett must be Diana Mitford. Spoiler alert: Linda Radlett dies tragically at the end of The Pursuit of Love. Nancy Mitford loved her sister Diana, but was horrified by her political beliefs and rightly so because Diana was a Nazi. Maybe Nancy thought that death in childbirth was a better fate for Linda than Diana’s actual fate (imprisonment as a traitor to England during WWII followed by permanent exile from England). Runaway Jassy was obviously Jessica, my favorite Mitford. Even the Hons Cupboard was taken from real life at the Mitford home. 

Don’t Tell Alfred, on the other hand, seems more invented - in a good way. One thing I don’t know about the Mitfords is if they had a cousin like Fanny, or if she’s pure invention. I’ll have to find out, I guess, but I’m inclined to believe that it’s the latter because Fanny is, I think, a combination of Deborah, the youngest Mitford, and Nancy herself. Like Nancy, Fanny finds herself very much at home and at ease in Paris, but like Deborah, she also finds herself successfully managing a large and complex household and navigating the ins and outs of life on a very big stage. It’s a huge change for Fanny - from a quiet life in Oxford as a privileged but dull academic wife to wife of the English Ambassador to France in the postwar years. 

*****

The Pursuit of Love and Love in a Cold Climate are both almost entirely rooted in Mitford family history, with the former written as a tragedy and the latter written as a conventional society novel. Don’t Tell Alfred’s Fanny is informed by Nancy’s real life in Paris, but its events are entirely imagined, and its tone is society drama meets screwball comedy - somewhere between Barbara Pym and P.G. Wodehouse. With these three books, Nancy Mitford proved that as a writer, she could do pretty much anything. 


Friday, May 8, 2026

Devil Wears Prada 2 - SPOILERS LEFT, RIGHT, AND CENTER!

Last week, I saw the new Devil Wears Prada movie, and I’m still thinking about it. It’s not quite as good as the first one, of course, because that is a very high bar indeed. But it’s a worthy successor, and I was glad to be among the first to see it so that I could form my own opinion before all the other idiots had a chance to write about it on the internet. Sorry not sorry. I gotta write about something, you know? 

****

There are a few new characters but the story still focuses on the four main characters (Miranda, Andy, Emily, and Nigel). They are the same people we remember, but all of them have grown and changed, for better and for worse, in the 20 years since the first movie. Miranda is still imperious and demanding, but she’s no longer the devil. She’s mellowed enough that she even allows her first assistant to remind her that she can no longer say and do things that were acceptable in the 80s and 90s and early aughts. 20 years ago, Emily and Andy would have had their heads handed to them had they dared to comment on Miranda’s behavior. 

The sequel echoes themes from the original - betrayal and loyalty, the value of beauty and art and glamor, the moral issues around extreme wealth, the balance between work and life or if such a balance is even possible. And it touches on what it’s like to be a person and a professional in the year 2026. There are heartless billionaires, cliched but nonetheless utterly believable. There is downsizing and rightsizing and cost-cutting and evil tech bros not so subtly threatening to replace everyone and everything with AI. 

*****

The filmmakers did a good job of visual contrast between Runway 2006 and Runway 2026. Miranda’s office is still luxurious, but there are signs that Runway HQ is fraying a bit around the edges. Miranda assigns Andy to a cluttered, bare-bones office, which we know is meant to be a punishment - but the old Runway suite would never have had a cluttered space in the first place. There are fewer people and less activity and less glamor - the new Runway looks like any other modern open-concept office. It looks like a LInkedIn video depiction of a corporate “creative space.” It’s clean and bright and pretty, but it’s not awe-inspiring. There’s no mystique. 

*****

One of the questions that The Devil Wears Prada 2 asks is how much of all of this - fashion, “lifestyle,” beauty - are we supposed to care about. Do we mourn the loss of the aspirational fairy-tale world of 7th Avenue and Milan and Paris and the Hamptons, or is it good riddance to all of it? I think it’s a little of both. In the original movie, when Nigel lectures Andy about Runway’s place in art and culture, we know that he’s sincere and that Runway really is a “beacon of hope” for him. I felt that way about fashion magazines myself when I was young. I loved Vogue and Vanity Fair and Harper’s Bazaar and the whole world of high society and fashion and glamour that they presented in their beautiful, glossy pages. 

Nigel is partly right about fashion. The visionary designers of the 20th century really were artists, even when they weren’t very good people (Coco Chanel, I’m talking about you, girl). Designers really did, and still do, fulfill the need for beauty and elegance in our lives. Couture is out of reach for almost everyone, of course, but its ideas filter down to the rest of us - as Miranda says, all the way down to that infamous lumpy blue sweater in that tragic Casual Corner clearance bin. A young person in a big city earning an entry-level salary can buy a designer-inspired dress or purse and feel connected to a world of beauty and possibility. What could possibly be bad about that? 

Both movies answer that question, in different ways. In the first DWP, the bad part is (of course) unrealistic beauty and body standards. Perfectly normal Andy is the “smart fat girl.” Miranda rejects a photo spread of female paratroopers because they’re all “so deeply unattractive,” because in 2006, it was every woman’s job to be thin and attractive, no matter what else she might have accomplished in her life.* Poor Emily eats practically nothing to maintain her extremely slim figure, but even though she’s already reed-thin, she still hopes for that one stomach virus that will make her just a tiny bit thinner. No wonder she’s so grouchy all the time. 

The fashion industry didn’t invent unattainable beauty standards, but they might as well have. Before the advent of social media, fashion magazines led the way in perpetuating and normalizing airbrushed bodies and faces. Fashion magazines foisted toxic diet culture on us. Vogue has a lot to answer for. 

In the second movie, Runway’s dark side is farther upstream. After a 20-year absence, Andy returns to provide some serious journalistic credibility as the magazine tries to distance itself from a child labor scandal involving one of its most prominent advertisers. Meanwhile, the billionaires smell blood in the water, and they’re circling around like vultures waiting to snatch up the pieces if Runway doesn’t survive the scandal. The nepo baby finance bro billionaire is trying to “optimize” his late father’s media empire, and that includes stripping Runway down to the bare bones - Miranda, flying to Milan in COACH! - while the tech bro billionaire is trying to buy the magazine and by extension a place in the cultural hierarchy for himself and his girlfriend. Both of the billionaires are ready to dispense with as many of the humans behind the crown jewel that they’re fighting over, never mind that it’s human creativity and human blood sweat and tears that built Runway and made it a crown jewel worth fighting over to begin with. 

A spoiler - things end the way most of us who love the original would have hoped. One more even better spoiler: Both of the billionaires lose. 


*And thank God it’s not like that anymore, amirite? LOL.