Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts

Thursday, May 29, 2025

The Deer Hunter

On Memorial Day weekend, I watched “The Deer Hunter” for the first time. It took all weekend to finish the three-plus hours. When I first started watching it, I got through the first 45 minutes, and I was too depressed to continue - and at that point, no one had even gone to Vietnam. The thing is that I remember working class industrial life in the middle of the 20th century, and I don’t want to relive it, and I don’t romanticize it. And neither does the movie, really - but when your blue collar first-generation Americans are played by young Christopher Walken and young Robert DeNiro and young Meryl Streep there can’t not be a little bit of a romantic glow about the whole thing. 

Having started it, though, I wanted to finish, so I decided to watch it a little at a time throughout the weekend. This is a good way to watch a movie that you feel that you should watch but that is not particularly entertaining. “The Deer Hunter” is not really entertaining - but it’s pretty good and even beautiful in spots.  

For example, on the day after Steven and Angela’s wedding (the opening scene), the five friends go deer hunting together (the title is not an obscure 1970s metaphor). They drive through the western Pennsylvania mountains in a grimy old white Cadillac still festooned with “just married” pink streamers, winding through an otherwise pristine mountain road framed by rusted guardrails, and they stop to eat lunch beside a clear mountain lake. The landscape is completely unspoiled except for the paved road; and the contrast between the gorgeous mountain backdrop and the friends’ goofy horseplay and their makeshift picnic lunch of white bread and cold cuts is beautiful and real. 

I liked the characters’ names, too: Mikey and Steve and Nick and Linda and especially Angela and Stosh. If you grew up working class and Catholic in Philadelphia or Pittsburgh in the 1970s, your parents knew people named Angela and Stosh. Maybe your parents were Angela and Stosh. And although DeNiro and Streep and Walken are unrealistically glamorous for industrial western Pennsylvania, John Cazale as Stosh and Rutanya Alda (no relation) as Angela and George Dzundza as John and John Savage as Steven resemble the young adults I remember from that time - beautiful and imperfect and full of life. The actors were all wonderful. 

*****

One of my criticisms of “The Deer Hunter” is one that several contemporaneous critics apparently shared. These guys were just too old for Vietnam. Men aged 18 to 26 were subject to the draft during the Vietnam War, and “The Deer Hunter” doesn’t even try to depict its characters as younger than late 20s or early 30s. They are all grown men working in a steel mill. Christopher Walken, who was 35 when the movie was released, could possibly have passed for 26 in the right light, but none of the others looked a day younger than 32 or so. So they wouldn’t have been drafted. 

And it seems unlikely that grown, employed men would have volunteered - Steven especially, who marries the pregnant Angela and then ships out practically the next day. True, she’s pregnant by another man, but if you want to punish your fiancee for being unfaithful, it would seem that cancelling the wedding would be the prudent course of action. Marrying her and then going off to war seems like kind of a self-own. 

The timeline is also off. It’s supposed to begin in 1968. Would the men have remained in Vietnam for five years? Because “Midnight Train to Georgia” is clearly playing in the nightclub scene, and that song came out in 1973. Other than career military, I didn’t think that we kept men in Vietnam for more than a year at a time. On the other hand, Robert DeNiro’s Mikey would certainly not have made Staff Sergeant in just a year - and how did he get to be a Green Beret? And when he finally came home, why was he swanning around Clairton, Pennsylvania in his full uniform? Did he not own any other clothes? 

These are all little things, of course, but little things can make the difference between suspending disbelief and immersing yourself in the story, and sitting on your couch with your phone looking up details like when was “Midnight Train” released, and how long does it take to get from E-1 to E-5, and is there a Russian Orthodox church in Clairton, PA? (There is not - that scene was filmed in Ohio). There’s a lot that doesn’t make sense. There’s a lot that doesn’t add up. 

And there are bigger things, too. I expected a racist portrayal of the Vietnamese (the movie was made in 1978) but lots of military scholars have chimed in on the Russian roulette theme, with universal agreement that this never happened. The Viet Cong did plenty of other dreadful things to American prisoners so it’s not like there wasn’t ample material for a movie about the horrors of the war in Vietnam. And how on earth could Mikey return to Vietnam to rescue Nick, and then get out without a hair out of place AFTER the fall of Saigon? As Miss Eggy says, “The HELL?”

*****

All the racism and sexism and what-the-hell historical inaccuracy aside, I ended up enjoying “The Deer Hunter” as a beautifully acted relic of the middle of the American 20th century. I might even watch it again. But not right away. 


Monday, May 26, 2025

MDW 2025

It’s Saturday morning, Memorial Day weekend, and I haven’t even packed my pool bag yet. This is not like me, not like me at all. I’m not feeling summery. The vibe is off. 

And it’s not just the weather - but my gosh! I sat outside this morning, drinking my coffee and reading my book and enjoying the birdsong even though it was 55 degrees and I needed a hoodie and fuzzy socks and a blanket. I could have just stayed inside but it’s Memorial Day weekend and it was the first morning in weeks when I didn’t have to rush and I was determined to enjoy a leisurely half hour outside, even if it killed me. 

But I’m back inside now. It’s 10:08 and I need to come up with a plan. I think I’ll pack my pool bag. There’s almost no chance that I’ll actually get in the water today but I’m not ruling it out, either. I’m a member of the neighborhood’s small but hardy group of adult pool rats, and if the rest of the crew gets in that water, then I might have to do it too. 

*****

A few of us made our way to the pool yesterday afternoon, but only two adults actually got in the water - one of my fellow pool rats, and another person whom I don’t yet know. A new swim team dad, apparently - I overheard him talking to his little girl about how she’ll have to get in on Wednesday, the first day of practice, so she might as well get in today. And she did, and so he did too. The other person, a fellow summer lap swimmer, sat on the edge of that pool dangling his feet for so long that I thought he’d given up the idea of actually jumping into a pool full of ice water, but he did finally get in, and he didn’t even try to convince the rest of us that it’s fine once you get in because it so obviously was not. 

It’s warmer this morning, this being Sunday. I still wore a sweater and socks when I sat outside, but I didn’t need the blanket. I still don’t think I’ll get in the water today, but if the warming trend continues, I might swim tomorrow. 

*****

At some point during Memorial Day weekend, I try to watch a Memorial Day-appropriate movie. I’ve seen “Saving Private Ryan” about a dozen times. I also like “The Best Years of Our Lives.” “Platoon” and “Full Metal Jacket” are also good MDW movies.  But I wanted to watch something I hadn’t seen before, and until this weekend, I’d never seen “The Deer Hunter.” It’s quite good, though I couldn’t sit through the full 3-plus hours all at once. I ended up watching it in stages, 30 or so minutes at a time. I have a lot of questions about “The Deer Hunter,” and a lot of things to say about it. I’m going to write a post just about that movie. You’ll see it next week or a year from now. 

I also watched “Small Things Like These,” a movie adaptation of Claire Keegan’s brilliant novel. The movie is very very good (and how could it not be with a cast that includes Cillian Murphy and Emily Watson and Eileen Walsh and Clare Dunne), and the abrupt ending is exactly right. Knowing what we know about Eileen and her fear of outsider status for herself and her family, we can’t expect a happily ever after ending for Sarah, and it seems quite likely that Eileen will try to throw her out as soon as she discovers what Bill has done. But Bill takes that risk anyway - a small thing, trying to save just one girl when there are so many others in Sarah’s position - but most of us can only do small things. 

*****

It’s Monday now. I love the Monday of a three-day weekend. An extra day off is such a gift, even if it’s too cold to swim. I’m thinking about trying today, though - two more of my swimming friends did it yesterday, and I don’t want to wait until the water warms up because it’s not going to warm up anytime soon. But if I can’t steel myself to the water today, it will still have been a weekend of book shopping (Barnes and Noble with a Mothers’ Day gift card), movies, reading and writing outdoors, sushi, wine drinking with friends, and almost no Trump. And now it’s summer - and as always, I have no problems that summer cannot solve. 


Sunday, April 21, 2024

Consequences

Have you ever heard of the Order of the Thistle? I saw a headline this morning noting that HRH King Charles has bestowed the Order of the Thistle on his youngest sibling Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh (yes, he inherited the title). I knew about the Order of the Garter and the Order of St. Michael and the tradition of chivalric societies whose only purpose seems to be to honor people who please the King or Queen in some way, but the Thistle was a new one for me. The Order of the Thistle honors Scottish people and honorary Scottish people like the Duke who have performed some extraordinary service to the monarchy. I don’t know very much about Prince Edward, but I’m sure that he has performed many extraordinary services to the Crown, not least of which is that he is not Prince Andrew. 

*****

I just finished watching “Scoop,” the Netflix movie about the BBC’s infamous BBC Prince Andrew interview, an event that I think hastened the inevitable end of the Royal Family. At the time that this interview took place (2019), the Queen was still relatively hale and hearty, and the senior Duke of Edinburgh was still alive though he had pretty much retired from public life. Although the Queen and Prince Philip were living on borrowed time, it seemed that the next generation, led by Prince Charles, would be ready to step in; and the younger senior Royals seemed happy and united and ready to serve the institution well into the future. 

I’m not an expert on the Royal Family. I’m not even that close an observer. And if the UK becomes a republic, there will be lots of things to blame - COVID, the unpopularity of Charles and Camilla, the turmoil surrounding Harry and Meghan; and of course, the death of Queen Elizabeth II, without whom the monarchy seems kind of pointless. But that interview would be a contributing factor because it threw into stark relief the outrageous impunity with which people of that class commit crimes and misdemeanors, and their absolute blank cluelessness about their behavior and its impact on others. I think that it marked the turning point for many Brits who were already ambivalent about the Royal Family and its place in British life. 

“Scoop” conveys the blank cluelessness part very well. Prince Andrew and his slavishly loyal Palace factotum come away from the disastrous interview all smiles, smug and secure and satisfied that the thing went very well, very well indeed. The viewer sees Andrew on the night of the broadcast, retiring to his private quarters to watch the interview, certain that it will be a triumph for him, that it will clear his name and restore his reputation with the British public and press, and that he’ll be able to return his focus to the important things, like a blowout 60th birthday party courtesy of the British taxpayer. Only when his phone begins to blow up with news feed updates and social media notifications and messages does he realize that he didn’t acquit himself quite as well as he thought, and that no one else seems to have noticed that he has a “tendency to be a bit too honorable.” 

A key aspect of this story, emphasized in the movie, is that the interview was the result of the work of three women - a BBC booker, producer, and anchorwoman. Two of the three women (a producer played by the amazing Romola Garai and the BBC anchorwoman played by the brilliant Gillian Anderson) are understood to be establishment figures, well educated and well connected, upper middle class at least. The third woman, Sam McAlister (played by the amazing and brilliant Billie Piper) was the driving force behind the interview, and if the movie hews closely to real life, she was the only working-class person among the three. Billie Piper’s Sam is brash and confident and fearless in the workplace but Piper allows us to see her insecurity, too. We see Sam at home with her school-age son and her mother, their down-to-earth unglamorous household a marked contrast to the Palace and probably also quite different from the households of Garai’s Esme Wren and Anderson’s Stella Maitlis, whose personal lives the movie does not really examine closely. 

It took three women to really clearly see how dreadful Andrew’s conduct was and to understand how important it was to hold him to account. By positioning Sam McAlister as the story’s heroine, the movie also suggests that only a working-class woman would be truly outraged at the impunity with which royals and aristocrats and just plain rich people hurt others and get away with it. Sam McAlister, portrayed by Billie Piper as plain-spoken, flamboyantly blond and label-obsessed (her Chanel pin is like a secondary character) has had enough of Eton and Harrow and Oxford and Cambridge and royals and their hangers-on and enablers, and she’s done waiting for someone to do something about it. By doggedly pursuing the Andrew interview, she not only lands the biggest story of the year for the BBC, she also brings about a small measure of justice for Epstein’s victims. 

Of course Andrew didn’t face criminal prosecution for knowingly participating in sex trafficking because let’s not get carried away here. I wonder how many British people, even if they’re not staunch royalists, would really even want to see a member of the Royal Family in the dock. That’s a question of change vs. revolution, which is quite a bit more than I want to go into right now. But he did face consequences. He lost many of his privileges and his Civil List income. And one of his victims sued him in civil court in the United States, and received a settlement in an undisclosed but presumably substantial amount. Maybe all of this is still not enough but for a person steeped in privilege and wealth and power for his whole life, the loss of those things must have been very hard, very hard indeed. Maybe it’s enough that Andrew had to experience the “find out” part of the proceedings in a very public fashion. 



Friday, January 19, 2024

Journalism

It’s Friday, a WFH day, and I’m not particularly productive right now. I have several big projects to tackle and I have to panic for a bit, and beat down my adult ADD, before I can really make progress. I wish I wasn’t like this but I am. It’s a holiday weekend, so I plan to get some things done to clear some space in my head. If you’re going to declutter, then you might as well start with the messiest place. My house is pretty neat; and now that Christmas is over, it’s pretty free of clutter, too. My brain, however, is like an episode of “Hoarders.” I might not be able to dig out on my own. 

*****

One of the things I hope to do this weekend - maybe not finish but at least work on - is my 2023 book list. I’ve already written about a book that I read in 2024, so I’m out of order as usual, but I am making progress on finishing the 2023 list and maybe I’ll publish it in January not February. 

It’s Saturday morning. We’re leaving for a swim meet in a little while (Marymount @ Gallaudet) but right now I’m just enjoying the three-day-weekend Saturday morning vibe. I love my job but there’s nothing better than a holiday weekend. It’s even better than vacation because a paid holiday is just a pure, unearned gift. Marymount hosted Catholic last night, our first evening meet as a Marymount swim family, and the boys’ team’s first loss of the season. But it was close and competitive and a lovely way to spend a Friday night, sitting in the Rose Bente Lee Center pool as the late winter afternoon faded into twilight. 

And see, there’s the problem right there. If I’m ever going to finish that book list, I need to write about books, not swimming. 

*****

“... what they had wanted all these years was not for concrete things to happen but for abstract possibilities to remain available.” This is Lea Ypi, writing about her parents’ ambivalence about Albania’s first post-Communist election. I’m reading Free: Coming of Age at the End of History, her very extraordinary memoir of her life as a child and teenager in late Communist and post-Communist Albania, a country about which I know practically nothing. Ypi’s family kept secrets about their “biography,” including the fact that her great-grandfather was one of the country’s last pre-Communist Prime Ministers. When Communist rule ended, Ypi had to relearn her own family’s history, and re-examine everything she knew and believed and thought that her family believed. How does a young person, already whipsawed by adolescent confusion, regain her bearings when she finds that the country, the belief system, and the family that she thought she knew turn out not to be a sturdy structure with a rock-solid foundation but a rickety makeshift shack held together with spit and glue and lies? Who are you if your family isn’t who you thought they were? What are you if your country no longer exists?

******

And what are you if you can’t seem to get up off the couch? It’s Monday now, MLK Day so I’m off although I did plan to do some work today to make up for a planned short Friday. But it’s 10:30 and although I have showered and done some housework, I’m nowhere near my desk. I can’t seem to pull myself off the couch right now, physically or mentally. It’s very cold, and snowing lightly. I don’t have to leave the house today and I probably won’t. MSNBC is on as background noise in my family room, the warmest room in the house. 

Oh my gosh what is wrong with me and what am I doing? It’s 10:45 now and I’m wearing pajama pants and a hoodie, curled up on my couch, my hair still wet from the shower and absolutely no plans or ideas or energy or inspiration for this gift of a day off that I don’t want to waste but am in fact actually wasting. I need to pull myself together. Or maybe I just have to accept that today is one of those proverbial days, filled with lots of abstract possibilities. I just don’t seem to have the energy to make any of those possibilities concrete. 

*****

I’m back at work now. It’s Tuesday, a day on which I almost always work from home, and everyone else is working from home today too thanks to the unexpected snow accumulation. Why unexpected, I don’t know, because the forecast was clear, and it is January, but it’s been so long since we have had actual winter weather that I didn’t think that a real snowstorm was possible. I thought the forecast was just weather-industrial complex hype. I thought it was just another media narrative. 

We only got maybe five inches or so, but this is the DC suburbs of Maryland, not Buffalo. We’re famous for freaking out at the smallest accumulation of snow. I haven’t left my house since Sunday but I’m sure that if I ventured out to a grocery store today, I’d find shelves stripped bare. Thankfully I didn’t run out of milk or toilet paper because I’m always ready for the worst case scenario. Rain, snow, whatever - I seldom run out of anything. 

And speaking of the worst case scenario, yesterday was also Iowa caucus day and of course Trump won by a landslide. Not that Haley or DeSantis are anything other than repugnant to me, but the idea of another Trump presidency,  which is a very real possibility, fills me with something close to despair. I just can’t bear the thought of looking at his face and hearing his voice every day for four more years. I dread the rest of this election season. I used to love election years, too. Sad!

*****

But I’ll tell you what. An entire childhood and youth obsessed with political repression and dictatorships had its upside. I’m prepared. No matter how much I hate what might be happening a few miles from my front door in Washington, I am prepared to live my life and do my work and go on with my daily existence without regard to politics. Unless it gets really bad and they start rounding up dissidents and I end up in a detention camp. 

And this is why I shouldn’t be reading political memoirs, or doomscrolling my newsfeeds, or listening to MSNBC all the gosh darn livelong day. I should probably just go outside except that it’s literally 12 degrees out there, which is absolute nonsense. This weather is trash. This weather is for penguins and polar bears and ice fishermen. 

*****

Have you seen “The Holdovers?” A friend and I had planned to see it in a theater, back in November or early December; and what with the round of one damn thing after another that constitutes life for middle aged ladies, we ended up postponing our plans multiple times and ultimately missing the short theatrical run. And then we had to cancel three consecutive planned dates to watch it at my house. One damn thing after another, I tell you. Last Saturday, I realized that my husband had to work in the evening, and my friend’s husband was going to be glued to an NFL playoff game, so we made a last-minute plan to watch the movie together with another friend, and we were all free, and no one got sick and no one had a last-minute work obligation or family emergency, and we actually got to sit down with wine and popcorn and watch the movie. 

I don’t know why, but I can’t get enough of movies and books about exclusive boarding schools and colleges - preferably in New England in the middle of the 20th century, but any story about a boarding school or prestigious college will do. The Catcher in the Rye, A Separate Peace, Prep, The Secret History, Brideshead Revisited, “Rushmore,” even “The Dead Poets Society” - I love them all.  I also adore Paul Giamatti and Da’Vine Joy Randolph (absolutely hilarious in “Only Murders in the Building”) - and so I knew going in that I’d love “The Holdovers.” And I did. It is hilariously funny, but also heartbreakingly sad, with its little band of outcast characters stumbling through a cold and gray holiday season full of empty days, loneliness, and grief. And the cold and gray and emptiness are sweet and human and really beautiful. It’s a beautiful, perfect little movie. I hope it wins everything. I can’t wait to watch it again. 

*****

It’s Friday again, and in my original plan, I’d have been driving to Fredericksburg for a late afternoon meet between Marymount and University of Mary Washington; but there’s another winter storm, and the college swimming powers that be cancelled the meet. It’s just as well. The idea of my son and all of his teammates riding on snowy roads in a charter bus was making me very anxious, and although I had been looking forward to the meet, I wasn’t looking forward to the drive. I’m hopeful that tomorrow’s meet at St. Mary’s of Maryland will proceed as planned. 

Meanwhile, I’ve been writing this for a whole week and I’m still looking for the unifying theme that will give me an excuse to paste the whole mess into my blog editor and press publish. Didn’t I say something about brain decluttering? Not only have I not decluttered my own brain, but now I’ve dropped a whole bunch of junk off in yours. Sorry. 

****

At the end of Free, Lea Ypi shares some of her teenage journal entries from the year 1997, a violent and chaotic year in Albania. It was my favorite part of the book, just a person thinking and feeling and writing it all down knowing that it’s possible that someone might read her journal one day but that it’s just as possible that no one ever will. And that is my unifying theme, for this post and for every word that I write on this blog. Sometimes people read this stuff, which is lovely; and sometimes they don’t, which is fine. I write because it’s the only way that I can begin to make sense of things. I write because I have to. 


Thursday, January 11, 2024

Regulation

It seems that I am not the only person who struggles with anxiety. My newsfeeds are filled with advice from experts real and self-proclaimed on how to regulate my stress response, activate my parasympathetic nervous system, stimulate my vagus nerve (what?), drop my shoulders while engaging my core and practicing breathwork, and just calm the heck down. I don’t do any of this. I look out the window instead. 

If we ever left this house, the view outside my office window is one thing that I would really miss. And it’s not a particularly spectacular view. It’s just pretty - a large number and variety of trees on both sides of the fence between my neighbor’s house and mine, the hanging birdfeeders and the visiting birds, and the sky, which is wintery pale bright blue today, with a few fluffy pink-edged clouds. There are many window views that are more beautiful but few that are more soothing. 

*****

I wrote that yesterday, which was a rather bad day. Today is much better. It's Friday afternoon and I'm in the stands at the Rose Bente Lee Center pool at Marymount University, watching the first meet of the second half of the 23-24 season. Marymount is hosting Randolph Macon and my son's medley relay just scored its first victory of 2024. As the B relay they should have finished second but someone forgot to tell them that. 

The women's 1000 yard freestyle is just finishing up, and the men will follow. Distance events are not my jam but I certainly admire the athletes in a better them than me kind of way. 

*****

We’re midway through the meet now, and the swimmers are warming up for the second half. It's a close, competitive meet, fun to watch. I think we're winning but I'm not sure. But we're not running away with it. Marymount completely dominated its early season opponents, so much so that it was almost like watching an intramural meet. Winning is great and all but I'd rather see a real race. I like a good old fashioned duel in the pool. 

*****

Saturday morning, cold and very pale gray. It’s January 6, and we’re waiting for the threatened or promised winter weather that was supposed to begin this morning. So far, it’s nothing but January cold and a silvery gray sky that looks very soon-to-snowish. The rest of the house is asleep, and I’m back in front of my window, watching the birds enjoy breakfast at the just-refilled feeder. The seed mix that comes out of that big Costco bag must be delicious because it’s a scene out there, bird-wise. It’s a bird party. I could sit in front of this window all day. 

Yesterday’s meet finished in a split decision - a win for the men and a loss for the women. My son won one of his individual events, too. Today, I’ll work for a bit to catch up. I had had some vague idea that I’d try to work for a bit during the distance events at the meet yesterday but that was just silly. But I don’t mind working today. Yesterday was almost a day off. It felt very Saturday-ish. And the weather today is dreadful, so I’m not going anywhere unless I have to. 

*****

Saturday was a gloomy gloomy day. Not unpleasantly gloomy, just weather gloomy, with an ice storm vibe. It wasn’t quite cold enough for ice, but almost. I got my hair cut in the morning and then came home and worked and did housework and read my book (The Broom of the System) and watched a movie (“Leave the World Behind”) and hung around the house, now pretty much completely clear of all signs of Christmas except for a few boxes of chocolate that still remain in the kitchen. It’s sunny and bright today and the place feels wide open. The day feels wide open. It’s Sunday and I don’t have any particular plans other than to get out of the house. An indoor day is nice once in a while but one is enough. 

*****

Have you seen “Leave the World Behind”? It’s a disaster movie, kind of, but we never really find out what causes the disaster - a foreign attack, a cyber event, an environmental catastrophe - but the world goes haywire just as an affluent Manhattan family begins its impromptu vacation in a beautiful rental house in the Hamptons. The owners of the house, a Black man (Mahershala Ali) and his daughter, show up in the middle of the night after escaping from chaos in the city, and the tenants (Julia Roberts and Ethan Hawke) must decide whether or not to trust them, having never actually met them face to face. Things get increasingly chaotic and terrifying - strange animal encounters, and self-driving cars going haywire, and a mysterious illness that strikes one of the vacationers’ children - and the two families are forced to overcome their mutual suspicion and mistrust, given that they appear to be the only people remaining, except for an angry, armed survivalist played very well by Kevin Bacon. 

Most of the action takes place in and around the beach house, and with the very small cast (the two families and Kevin Bacon) it has a closed-off, quasi-theatrical feel. But it’s still realistic, and scary. I liked the movie very much, even though dystopian disaster movies are the last thing I should be watching right now given my pretty fragile grip on reason. Julia Roberts is especially good as the everywoman wife and mother who is angry at the world and racked with guilt over her own ill temper and bad disposition. She shares the movie’s best scene (in my view) with the very talented My’hala Herrold as Mahershala Ali’s done-with-these-damn-white-people daughter. Surrounded by a pack of wild deer and other animals who appear to be poised to attack (and I keep telling you that the deer are going to turn predator), the two women stick together, face down the animals, and ultimately scare them away. They hold hands, clinging to one another as they realize - to both their relief and dismay -  that they need one another, and that even though people are the worst, it’s far worse to be without them. 

*****

I like to re-read books sometimes, especially at times like now when my mental health is not great. I hadn’t thought about The Broom of the System - or David Foster Wallace in general - in years, but Zadie Smith reminded me to revisit Wallace, and The Broom of the System was my favorite book for a short time during my twenties. I wanted to see if it held up. 

Wallace wrote The Broom of the System, his first novel, when he was in his 20s and it created quite a stir - critics recognized Wallace as a genius right away. I think it was popular too - my friends and I all read it, at least. What still works - the book is still very funny, hilariously so; and very imaginative. Wallace juxtaposed the real (Cleveland, Ohio; Amherst College, Gerber baby food, Bob Newhart) and the imagined (the Great Ohio Desert, Stonecipheco Baby Foods, the Reverend Hart Lee Sykes) seamlessly, and creates a world that is both absurd and believable, and that the reader recognizes and understands almost immediately. The dialogue is hilarious, and the characters are flawed and neurotic (or downright crazy) and interesting. 

The book still holds up, for the most part, though of course I saw it very differently as an almost-old woman as I am now vs. a very young woman (maybe 22) when I first read it. I really loved Lenore Beadsman, the main character, when I was in my 20s. She was different from every other female character in books and movies and TV. She was quirky and fiercely independent. She was not glamorous or fashionable but she was obviously beautiful, being the object of desire for at least four of the novel’s male characters. She was, of course, an early Manic Pixie Dream Girl, which explains why I loved her so much. Even before we had a name for her, young women in their 20s were (and remain) very susceptible to the allure of the MPDG. She’s not like all the other girls. 

*****

I started writing this a week ago, in the midst of an anxiety spiral that has mostly passed. Writing about it and then thinking about other things - like swim meets and books and movies - helps me to get a grip and to calm down a little. It helps me to regulate my nervous system, as the influencers like to say. Of course, who am I to need regulating? I’m not walking on a beach or digging in a peaceful green garden but I’m also not fighting for my life in the middle of a war or disaster. I’m not facing down a pack of attack deer (I promise you, they will be a thing very soon). I’m not lost in the middle of the Great Ohio Desert, handcuffed to a madman (Wallace reference, IYKYK). Everything is fine. Everything is grand. Reading and writing are all I really have any business doing anyway. 

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

Should auld acquaintance be forgot

“One never knows at Christmas time, does one?” That is Miranda’s mother in the Christmas episode of the first season of “Miranda,” commenting on the dateless and timeless quality of the week between Christmas and New Year’s. It’s December 28 in my life, a fact that I can only cite because I looked at the date on the bottom of my computer screen. Absent that reminder, I would have had no idea of the date. And I think it’s Thursday. 

And I’m pretty sure that I forgot to write anything yesterday, too. So that’s two days out of 365 in the year 2023 when I failed to write any words. And it’s fine. There are enough of my words out here; a few days missed production won’t make a difference. 

It’s been a weird, though not unpleasant Christmas break. We didn’t really go places as we normally do because my husband is sick with the flu, and it rained for two days straight. We’ve been watching movies and sports. We’ve been eating cookies. We ventured out to the bookstore and the grocery store. It’s been low-key but kind of nice. 

*****

Have you seen “Saltburn”? Starting at the end of the year, I try to catch up with movies that will likely garner major award nominations, and Christmas vacation is the perfect time to do this. “Saltburn,” which is expected to be an awards contender, is streaming now so I watched it. 

Much has been made of “Saltburn.” It’s violent, sexually transgressive, mean-spirited, sharply critical of British upper class social snobbery, and full of beautiful people wearing beautiful clothing in beautiful settings; so naturally, critics have praised it rather lavishly. 

Spoiler alert: “Saltburn” starts with a scholarship student at Oxford, a student named Oliver Quick whom we are at first supposed to believe is a poor and clueless outsider, completely out of his depth among his aristocratic classmates, unable to cope socially in a world of money and privilege. We’re supposed to feel sorry for Oliver, scorned and ostracized by Oxford’s elite, who grew up with an arcane and complex code of etiquette with which he is totally unfamiliar. Poor lonesome Oliver longs to belong, and he falls in love with the upper class in general and with one person in particular, the beautiful and charismatic Felix, who is the center of everything, the most inside of the insiders. 

Does this sound familiar? It will if you saw “The Talented Mr. Ripley” or if you read Brideshead Revisited, both of which tell the stories of middle-class outsiders invited into the inner circles of the rich; and both of which are far more interesting and nuanced than the stylish and misanthropic and hateful “Saltburn.” Of course, nothing is what it seems in “Saltburn,” and the series of tragedies that follow Oliver’s invitation to join Felix and his family at Saltburn, their country estate, are not chance occurrences. You’ll have to watch it if you want to find out what actually happens and how. Or you could just read the Wikipedia plot summary, which might be a better idea than sitting through this movie. I did that after I watched the movie. This is how I learned that the movie was filmed in a 4:3 aspect ratio rather than the more conventional 16:9. I’m sure that there was an artistic reason behind that technical decision, but I didn’t notice it when I was watching the movie, but I don’t tend to notice details like that. I’m not a critic. 

Barry Keoghan is mentioned in all of the critics’ “best of” lists and is sure to receive many nominations for his performance as Oliver. But he left me cold, as did the entire movie. Even Richard E. Grant and Rosamund Pike, whom I normally adore, are wasted here. “Saltburn” is a two thumbs down for me, but what do I know, other than the difference between right and wrong?

*****

Thursday was the first nice day all week, so we drove to Harper’s Ferry for the afternoon. West Virginia sounds so dreadfully far away but on a good traffic day, Harper’s Ferry is a one-hour drive, even when I’m driving. Harper’s Ferry is a little gem of a town, rich with history, architecturally very interesting (especially the WPA-era train tunnel), and surrounded by stunning natural beauty. It sits at the confluence of the Potomac and Shenandoah Rivers, and at the intersection of the Appalachian and C&O Trails, with the Blue Ridge Mountains as a natural backdrop. You can hike or stroll or bike or canoe or poke around in little shops and get your National Parks passport stamped, all in just an afternoon. We had a lovely time there, basking in the unseasonable warmth and clear bright late December sunshine and clean mountain air; and we were home before dark. 

*****

I had to work on Friday, oddly enough. At least one person needs to be in the office during business hours (why, I don’t know) and Friday was my turn, so I left my house at 7 and breezed on to the base at 7:25. There’s always an upside of working on December 29. The streets were near-empty. And the office was near-empty, too. I worked in fits and starts, finally hitting a groove at about noon, with a burst of energy and concentration and inspiration that allowed me to finish a project that’s been hanging over my head for a bit. At 2:30, the only other person on the floor stopped by my desk to wish me a happy new year. “Don’t stay too late,” he said. It had already been unnaturally quiet on the floor, but now that I knew for sure that I was the only person left on the floor (and likely the only person left in the building) the quiet was a bit eerie. I finished my work listening to holiday-week NPR on my headphones and then packed up at 4 and walked across the empty brick courtyard for the last time in 2023. By 5 o’clock, I was home in cozy sweats, back in holiday mode. 

*****

After one pretty bad movie, I watched a pretty good movie. Bradley Cooper’s “Maestro,” which was slightly controversial because of the prosthetic nose that Cooper wore to play Leonard Bernstein. I suppose I can see both sides of this little uproar, but the movie is really quite good. Cooper manages the macro and the micro very well; the micro being the story of Bernstein and his wife, Felicia Montelegre (Carey Mulligan in an absolutely lovely performance) and the macro being the whole American century that made a life like Leonard Bernstein’s possible. The movie is beautiful to look at and listen to, with outstanding performances from the entire cast, especially Mulligan. 

*****

So it’s late December (well it’s January now) and what would late December in the post-COVID era be if at least one member of the household wasn’t stricken by a hideous upper respiratory infection? Three of the four of us were sick to varying degrees, with one person going down just as another began to recover. A bunch of COVID tests, dozens of oranges, a bottle of zinc tablets, two urgent care visits, Tamiflu, amoxicillin, and a partridge in a pear tree. Everyone’s fine now. For now. 

****

Clutter is delightful for exactly two weeks of the year, and not one second more. From about December 19 to about January 3 or so, our house is full of presents wrapped and unwrapped, treats homemade and store-bought, Christmas decorations and knick-knacks and trinkets, wrapping and baking supplies, and a big fat Griswold family Christmas tree that takes up half the living room. And it’s lovely but when it’s over, it’s over. It’s January 3 now, and it’s over. Two days ago, my house felt sparkly and magical and cozy all at once, and today it feels like a very special episode of “Hoarders.” It’s time to break it down. 

I’m always a tiny bit sad when I start taking down the Christmas decorations, but once all the Christmas stuff is packed away and all of our pictures and paintings and books and objects are back in their proper places, freshly dusted, the house seems calm and peaceful and welcoming again. The tree will stay until January 7. Its exit will clear a ton of physical and metaphorical space for a new season and a new year. The past few years have taught me not to tempt fate with hilariously snide “don’t let the door hit you in the ass” messages to the departing old year. I don’t want to encourage “Hold my beer” energy from 2024, know what I mean? I'll just leave you by saying Happy New Year. 


Wednesday, March 8, 2023

Sinead and Edna

It’s a rainy Friday, a WFH day for me, and I’m still in my pajama pants, though I am wearing a respectable business casual sweater and could pass muster as a working professional from the neck up, if an unplanned teleconference forces me to show myself. I was going to change out of the pajama pants but it’s almost three o’clock now and I have no plans to leave the house unless it’s on fire so I think I’m dressed (or half-dressed) for the day. 

The thing is that I’m tired because I was out until after midnight last night, a rare occurrence for me on a Thursday night. The AFI Silver is hosting an Irish film festival and last night’s feature was “Nothing Compares,” the Sinead O’Connor documentary. I suppose I could have rented it but an Irish film festival seemed a better venue than my couch. An opportunity to see it with my people, so to speak.

The evening did not disappoint, although full disclosure, I did fall asleep for a bit in the rather long interval between our dinner at the Limerick Pub in Wheaton and the 9:45 movie time. We arrived at the AFI at 9 o’clock, to an almost empty lobby. The box office person told us that the early screening was running late and that our show wouldn’t start until 10, leaving us with an hour to sit and wait. An hour at 9 PM, which is when I always hit the wall, especially after a hamburger and 1.5 Smithwicks. And we were sitting there in the nearly deserted lobby, on a pair of comfortably cushioned movie theater chairs, and there was nothing stopping me from closing my eyes for a few minutes, and so I did. My husband sat next to me, scrolling through his news feed. He might have napped for a few minutes, too. I don’t know because I was fast asleep, sitting right in the middle of a movie theater lobby in downtown Silver Spring. 

And then another movie let out and all of a sudden the lobby was a whirlwind of Irish film festival energy, and the ushers and concession stand employees were strolling amid the crowds handing out pints of Guinness in plastic cups. 

My husband, who is not a documentary film fan nor a particular admirer of Sinead, was very impressed with the free Guinness, although “free” is a pretty loose term considering that the movie tickets cost $22 each. I thought for a moment, as I held my free plastic pint cup of Guinness, which I don’t especially like, that maybe as lower middle-income parents of college students, we might have been wiser to just stream the movie at home. But sometimes you need to get out. 

I’m a very very very introverted person but that doesn’t mean that I don’t love people. I love being out among people. I have to plan ahead and muster my energy and maybe take a nap in public just before the people descend upon me but with enough preparation, I can really enjoy a crowd. I was wide awake as soon as the people filled the lobby, the people leaving the early showing and the people arriving all at once for the later showing, all of them excited to be out on a Thursday, dressed in jeans and sweaters and skirts and t-shirts, some in Irish sweaters. It was cold, so there were lots of interesting jackets. Women outnumbered men by 2 to 1 or so (not every man is as good a sport as my husband) and so there were also lots of interesting handbags. People were laughing and talking and hoisting their “free” pints of Guinness. There was lots of energy. It was something of a scene. 

The movie was excellent. I read Rememberings last year, and most of the events depicted in the movie were covered in the book (including the now-infamous SNL performance, though why infamous I don’t know because what did they think that Sinead O’Connor was going to do, just stand and look pretty and sing her little song and go home?), although not the reverse. The movie didn’t get into Sinead’s difficult professional relationship with Prince, except for an ending credit explaining that Prince’s estate refused to allow the filmmakers to use the song for which the movie was named. But that’s not my favorite Sinead song anyway, and there were lots of clips of performances during her early stardom, when her extraordinary voice was at its best. She really is one of the greatest female singers of the 20th and 21st centuries. Definitely worth leaving the house on a cold Thursday night in March. 

*****

And Sinead is not the only rebellious Irishwoman on my radar this week. I’m reading Edna O’Brien’s Country Girls trilogy and although I can see its literary merit and can understand why it has become a modern Irish classic, I also cannot wait to be done with it and will not miss Caithleen and Baba, not one bit. Or rather, I won’t miss the mid-20th century Irish misogyny that shaped these two hot messes in female human form. 

Caithleen (Kate) Brady and Brigid (Baba) Brennan, although they both live well outside the very restrictive circa 1955 Irish Catholic social norms, do not enjoy their rebellion. Kate, in fact, is not rebellious at all; she’s just a book-smart and street-stupid girl with no emotional self-control who falls for the wrong man and proceeds to make her life miserable over him, and his as well (spoiler alert - he deserves it). Kate’s lifelong friend Baba is the spoiled daughter of a prosperous Irish country veterinarian. Baba is hilariously funny, as mean as a snake, and completely without morals of any kind. She is almost nihilistic in her lack of normal human sympathy and her boredom with everything and everyone. Baba is also married to a terrible man with whom she lives a miserable loveless existence. 

The trilogy was apparently extremely controversial in Ireland when it was published, and it’s still shocking in places. But the most shocking thing about it is that it’s not just a whole novel, it’s three whole novels, about two characters who are so unlikable that they can’t even stand themselves. I kept reading until the end because I generally do that, and because the trilogy has enough page-turning need-to-know-what-happens-next appeal that I wanted to keep going. But I will not miss these books or these characters at all, and I can’t wait to not read another Edna O’Brien book, pretty much ever again. 

I didn’t plan for this to publish on International Women’s Day but here it is, a serendipitous coincidence in which I finish a post on the perfect day to publish it. St. Patrick’s Day might be just as appropriate but if you have seen “Nothing Compares,” or if you’ve read The Country Girls and its sequels, you won’t feel much like celebrating Irish culture, especially if you don’t have a Y chromosome. 


Thursday, January 19, 2023

Feudal

Did you know that it’s possible to write a whole darn thing and then forget completely about it? Yesterday, for example, I started compiling my 2022 book list, and I started writing about Cloud Cuckoo Land, thinking to myself that it was one of the few books that I had read and not written about. And then as I started to write about it, I remembered that I actually HAD written about it. 

Did you also know that Google Docs will allow you to give two different documents the very same name? That doesn’t seem wise. 

Anyway, here is what I wrote about Cloud Cuckoo Land, the book; by way of “Heartburn,” the movie, just about a year ago. There’s a connection, however tenuous, I promise. 

*****

Last week on the very cold MLK Day holiday, I watched “Heartburn” on Hulu. I wrote about the Nora Ephron book upon which this movie is based right here. I don’t think that the movie was particularly popular or well-received when it was released in 1986, but it’s a good movie, as 80s movies go. Or maybe it’s not so much a good movie as a movie worth watching because of the great acting and the amazing scenery and sets and costumes: upper middle class homes and gardens, and spot-on bourgeois bohemian fashion, and mid-80s Washington and NY street and restaurant scenes. So I enjoyed watching “Heartburn,” but of course, it doesn’t hold up in a lot of ways. Few 80s movies do. 

*****

In the first act wedding scene, which takes place in Rachel’s father’s dream of an Upper West Side pre-war apartment, I noticed a Black guest. The actress who played her looked like Anna Maria Horsford (and I later looked her up on IMDB, and she was Anna Maria Horsford, thus explaining the resemblance). I thought that maybe Mike Nichols, who directed "Heartburn," thought that representation was important, and that’s why he made sure that his wealthy and artsy but powerful characters had Black friends who would naturally be invited to their weddings. 

LOL, no. Eventually we learn that Horsford’s character is not a wedding guest at all. She is Rachel’s father’s housekeeper, Della. There’s a scene in which we see poor Della minding her own business, doing her job, when Meryl Streep's Rachel (who has just left her philandering husband, played by Jack Nicholson) blows into the apartment like a hurricane, hugely pregnant, all wild hair and maternity sack dress and oversized big-shouldered jacket, with a toddler in one hand, and a Kenyan sisal tote bag* slung over the opposite shoulder. She takes up a lot of space. In five seconds, the large room is filled with nothing but Rachel. 

She flings her jacket and her bags and her personal belongings all over the apartment that Della is trying to clean, and immediately asks Della to babysit so that she can run right back out the door to do New York writer things. There is no mention of any additional compensation for the extra work, which is exactly what you would expect from Rachel and her ilk, now and then. What makes the scene typical of the 80s is that there is no real acknowledgement that for the housekeeper, caring for a toddler IS extra work in the first place. Spoiler alert: Della agrees to take care of the baby, of course, because what choice does she have? 

*****

In some ways, the whole movie is like that, all about the pretty much feudal relationships between upper class Washingtonians and New Yorkers and the people who clean their houses and care for their children and deliver their groceries. We don’t know if Rachel’s own nanny, Juanita (played by the same actress who played the housekeepers in “Clueless” and “Regarding Henry”) receives vacation pay or Social Security or any of the formal acknowledgements of the dignity and worth of her work that Rachel and Mark take for granted, but it’s safe to assume that she doesn’t. It was widely accepted then (as it is now) that only certain occupations are worthy of respect and therefore worthy of fair compensation, job security, dignified working conditions and treatment, and benefits. 

Still, working class people were better off then, in a lot of ways. Even if Juanita doesn’t receive benefits, she at least knows who her employers are. They interact with her daily. They pay her directly, cash in hand, not through a third party and certainly not through a mobile app. The grocery delivery man receives a tip from Catherine O’Hara, but he also gets a paycheck from the grocery store. He’s not subject to the vagaries of a five-star rating system designed by software developers whom he will never meet and who will never have a clue about any aspect of his job. 

*****

Wait, did you not come here for Soviet social realist film criticism? Yes, sorry, that took a bit of a turn. The thing that I can’t get out of my head is that I was an adult–a barely formed adult, but still an adult–when that movie came out, and the world that it depicts is almost completely gone. And in some ways, good riddance, obviously. But the gap between the working class and the well off, though it was wide enough at the time, still seemed bridgeable. Now that gap is more of a chasm, vast and ever widening; and the system of work and compensation has been so disrupted by the high tech industry (and not for the better) that it feels like the rich and powerful will continue to get richer and more powerful and the rest of us will be ever more subject to their whims until in 30 years or so we become a 5G feudal state. 

*****

I thought that maybe I had made up the phrase “5G feudal state” but I Googled it and found that of course somebody else got to it first. Did I say thirty years? Make it ten.

*****

Sometimes after I watch a movie, I’ll read the book upon which it is based but I have already read Heartburn and as we have already established, the book doesn’t hold up any better than the movie. It’s not Nora’s best. I like her essays better than her fiction. 

Instead, I read Cloud Cuckoo Land. I started this book with absolutely zero knowledge of the plot or the characters or the themes or anything at all. A friend whose taste I share recommended it and so I just opened it and started reading. My friend was not wrong - it’s a great book. The plot bounces around in time and space, moving the reader back and forth between 20th and 21st century America and the (of course) post-apocalyptic future and 15th century Constantinople (soon to become Istanbul). 

I won’t reveal any plot details except that there’s a part that involves an infectious disease and a quarantine. I don’t know if Anthony Doerr started writing Cloud Cuckoo Land before the COVID-19 pandemic began, but I guess that he did because the research and plotting for a book this complex must have taken more than two years. Well, it would have taken me more than two years, anyway. 

*****

The Cloud Cuckoo Land plot line that involves the virulent disease takes place in the post-apocalyptic future and given the last two years of plague, you’d think that this would be the most compelling part of the book. But it’s the 15th century scenes that seem most modern and relevant to me right now, filled as they are with desperately poor vassals and slaves and indentured servants who are utterly powerless and subject entirely to the whims and demands of their wealthy and powerful overlords. I don’t think that it’s likely that a small remnant of humanity will end up on a spaceship on a decades-long journey to a possibly hospitable planet (OK, one spoiler) but I do think that it’s likely (very) that we will return to a late middle ages social and economic and political system. It’s already happening. The 5G feudal state is under construction. 

*****

Again, I wrote most of this about a year ago, when people still thought Elon Musk was a genius. Things change in a year. 

We just had a three-day weekend, so we drove back to Philadelphia where we had just been two weeks ago so that my high school senior could visit Villanova. My sister lives ten minutes away from Villanova and she is also an alumna. My son is interested in several schools but his aunt is pushing him toward Villanova. 

My children are quite different from one another in many ways, including politics. My older son is a Bernie Sanders and AOC fan, and very attracted to radical progressive ideals. My younger son hates Trump but has no other thoughts about or interest in politics. 

Older son is a student at the University of Maryland. He's opposed to private colleges and universities, on principle, but he's still on winter break so he tagged along for the trip. We stopped at the bookstore and I asked him jokingly if he wanted a Villanova sweatshirt. 

He scoffed. "No," he said. "And I also don’t want golf clubs or a sailboat or a Vineyard Vines belt with little whales on it.” 

I laughed. “Yeah,” I said. “If you’re out here wearing a Villanova hoodie, you can’t stick it to the man because you are the man.” We said the “because you are the man” part in unison. This is one of my favorite jokes, and my children know it well. 

*****

And so I’m still hopeful for the future. Young people aren’t going to knuckle under to high -tech feudalism, not without a fight. Yes, they're all scrolling TikTok all the livelong day, but they’re not stupid. They are immune to the charisma of genius tech bro disruptors. They are wise to the gig work sector’s false promises of “flexibility.” They are neither afraid of nor awed by the Internet. They are less materialistic than their parents and grandparents, less worried about the right house and the right car. They aren’t afraid to fight the power, whatever and wherever and whoever it is. They aren’t afraid to stick it to the man. 

*****

* I used to have one of those tote bags. I bought it in 1985 when I was a student at Temple University, after months of seeing them on the shoulders of the most stylish students on campus. Some things never change. 


Thursday, November 10, 2022

Julie and Julia

I was very sad to learn of Julie Powell’s untimely death last week. I’m not sure why, really, other than just normal human sorry-to-hear-that impersonal sympathy. I never read her work. In fact, food literature is one category that I generally avoid. Of course I’m sorry to hear of anyone dying an unexpected death at age 49, but I felt this celebrity death a bit more than I expected to. 

Last weekend, during a spare 30 minutes, I started watching “Julie and Julia” on Hulu. I saw the movie when it first came out in 2009 and I remembered really loving the Julia scenes and not really loving the Julie scenes. Quick no-spoiler synopsis in case you haven’t seen the movie: It is based on both Powell’s eponymous memoir and Julia Child’s My Life in Paris, and it alternates between immediate post-9/11 New York City, where Julie Powell lived and worked as a mid-level bureaucrat; and Paris in the 1950s, where Julia Child lived an utterly enchanted life with her diplomat husband, Paul Child. Meryl Streep’s Julia, as I remembered her, was energetic and funny and full of infectious joy. Amy Adams’ Julie, on the other hand, was a whiny, anxious bundle of ridiculous neuroses. 

Well, now it’s perfectly obvious why I hated that character. Because it was like watching all the worst parts of myself, if only I looked like Amy Adams. 

Joking! Lol! Hilarious!

But in all seriousness, I watched part of the movie again, and as Johnny Cash once sang, I come away with a different point of view. I still liked the Julia parts of the movie better. Who wouldn't? Paris, international diplomacy at the height of the Cold War, glamour, mid century style, and what appeared to have been a perfect marriage vs. crowded subways, cubicles, yuppie bitch antagonists in place of friends, overwork, and domestic discord - really, no sane person would prefer Julie's life to Julia's. 

But the women themselves? Well movie Julie wasn't so bad. Yes she was whiny and spoiled and prone to temper tantrums but she was also compulsive and panicky and plagued with anxiety. 

Yes, I know. I keep coming back to this. She really is very much like me. I'd have freaked out over those stupid lobsters. I'd have dreaded boning the duck. Who wants to bone a duck for crying out loud? And I would for sure have pushed myself close to the brink of sanity to meet a fake, self-imposed, and entirely ridiculous deadline.

And besides, movie Julia (and I guess, real-life Julia) lived in Paris in a beautiful free apartment and she only worked because she wanted to. It was easy for movie Julia to be delightful. There would have been no excuse for her to be otherwise. 

*****

I never did read Julie and Julia, but now I think maybe I will. I’ll probably skip Cleaving (as the snotty-faced NYT called it, “Powell's sophomore and only other effort” - burn!) since I have already read one mercilessly honest exceedingly sexually frank overshare of a memoir this year. That one was enough for 2022 and it might have been enough of that genre for pretty much ever. But Julie and Julia is just my kind of thing - a memoir about a specific part of a person’s life and a story about a hard and exhausting though absurdly specific and quirky project. It’s a book about a person doing something that only she could have done. I’m going to finish re-watching the movie at some point, and then I’ll read the book and report back. 


Sunday, September 4, 2022

Vacation reading

It's been a while since I wrote about books, so I'm going to tell you all about last month’s vacation week reading. It's a mixed bag, as always. 

*****

We rented a beach house for a week in August, and I like to try to read a book off the shelf in whatever beach rental I end up in, and I did that this year, too. Most of the books on the bookcase in the sunny corner of the bedroom of our 2022 beach rental were pretty much trash but I found a copy of Colm Toibin's Brooklyn amid the dreck, so that was my beach novel for the week. Brooklyn is one of only a very few books whose movie version I prefer. That is not to say that it's a bad book because it's not. The writing is really beautiful. But novels are about characters for me, and I liked Movie Eilis (Eilis, pronounced “eye-lish,” is the main character) and I didn't much like Book Eilis. Movie Eilis is reserved and the viewer understands that this is because she is homesick, introverted, and just a generally quiet person. Book Eilis is also reserved, but that’s mostly because she’s a bit of a snob. Lace Curtain Irish, my dad would have called her. 

This is not a compliment. 

After her return visit to Ireland, Movie Eilis clearly comes back to her American husband Tony because she loves him, not just because terrible Miss O'Brien blackmails her with a threat to expose her secret marriage. Book Eilis seems only to return because she has to. But let’s be fair to Book Eilis. Movie Tony is obviously very lovable, and Book Tony is a bit of a cipher. There’s nothing wrong with him, he’s just not a particularly compelling character. He could be any reasonably nice guy. Still, the bitch married him. 

*****

Did you come here looking for sharp and cogent literary criticism? How many times do I have to tell you not to do that? 

*****

After Brooklyn, I read another beach book, this one a purchase from my favorite store, a used book shop called Barrier Island Books. I should write about the store because I’m clearly not capable of writing about the books. Note to self. I’ll get to that later. Anyway, the book that I purchased was Carrie Fisher: A Life on the Edge, by Sheila Weller. I am a Carrie Fisher super-fan, and so this book told me practically nothing that I didn’t already know, but I didn’t read it for information. I read it because I wanted to revisit a world that Carrie Fisher was still part of. Carrie and her mother Debbie Reynolds were both American archetypes (the rebellious and spoiled but neglected Baby Boomer Hollywood child and the Midwestern no-nonsense up-by-her-bootstraps tap-dancing, singing, smiling never-not-working movie star mother) AND absolutely individual and different from anyone else of their time or any other time. They were living proof that people are like snowflakes and fingerprints: no two alike. There will never be another Carrie Fisher or Debbie Reynolds, God rest their souls. 

*****

If you’re still reading, you just learned a little bit about Carrie Fisher and pretty much nothing about the book (it was good, BTW). I’m 0 for 2 on the book reviews, aren’t I? Well, you were warned once, and if you’re still hanging, then that’s on you, isn’t it? Caveat emptor, know what I mean? 

*****

I’m a very big fan of Christopher Guest movies, especially "Best in Show." And as anyone who reads this blog knows, I am also a very big fan of Nora Ephron. And if you draw a Venn diagram with Christopher Guest movies in one circle and Nora Ephron’s entire oeuvre in the other, the intersection will absolutely contain Parker Posey. When her book You’re on an Airplane popped up in my Kindle recommendations, I did not hesitate. Plus, I love quirky memoirs. This one is premised on the idea that you and Parker Posey are sitting next to one another on a long flight, and she tells you stories about her life. The premise is good though the execution is not consistent. She drops the airplane theme for a bit in the middle, and then in a late chapter, she ends a paragraph with a sentence that goes something like “Oh thank you, I’d love some peanuts.” I had no idea what that was supposed to mean and then I remembered that Parker and I are supposed to be on an airplane together, and the flight attendant is offering us a snack. 

Not long ago, I read Chuck Klosterman’s The Nineties (which requires a whole separate post and I don’t know if I’ll ever get around to that) and he didn’t mention Parker Posey even one time. This is a serious omission because if you want to understand nineties pop culture, you can do no better than to consider the very existence of Parker Posey’s movie career. No other decade before or since could possibly have produced Parker Posey, movie star. Parker Posey has lived an interesting life, and she is, not surprisingly, a very good writer. I recommend this book. 

*****

OK, I’ll give myself ½ credit for that last one. And yes, I would love some peanuts too, thank you. 

*****

I used to read a book in a single day all the time. Now, between legitimate busy-ness, eyestrain, and ever-worsening adult ADD (I assure you that this is a thing), it often takes me a week or more to finish a book. But I can cram a ton of reading into a vacation week. I almost forgot about this last one (really the first one), because I started it a few days before I went on vacation and finished it that weekend. 

Emma Goldberg’s Life on the Line: Young Doctors Come of Age in a Pandemic is a book that I would never have read on my own, but the medical students were reading it as part of orientation week activities, and so I read it too. Goldberg writes about six young New York doctors who begin their residencies several months early during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. I won’t tell you any more than that (oh, you didn’t actually expect me to review this book, did you?) except that reading this book dragged me right back into the middle of 2020, which is a time that I do not care to revisit right now or likely ever, and yet I still really liked it. 

******

Brooklyn is the only one of these four books that has earned serious literary recognition (though I’m betting that Life on the Line will eventually win some prizes). I think it was even a Man Booker Prize finalist. And I’m not saying it shouldn’t have been because it is a very fine book. But I rank it fourth of these four, and it’s not even close. If you haven’t seen the movie, then you might like it better than I did. Just don’t read it expecting Saiorse Ronan, Emory Cohen, Jim Broadbent, and Julie Walters (who is absolutely hilarious as Eilis’s landlady Mrs. Kehoe). 

You know what? Just watch the movie. I almost never like movie versions of books and I really NEVER like a movie better than the book on which it is based, but never say never, I suppose, because here is one case in which the movie really is superior to the book. 

*****

And another thing. I AM going to write about The Nineties. I’ve already started, in fact. And it’s no better than this hot mess. Fair warning, as always. Watch this space. 


Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Sugar, spice, whatever

I watched a few minutes of “Rocky” one night last week. I’ve seen “Rocky” many times, and although I haven’t seen it start to finish in many years, I will always watch it for a little while when I come across it. I picked it up right at the scene in which Rocky tries to instruct young Marie, the street-corner-hanging, tight-jeans-wearing, tough little South Philly kid, on how to be a “nice” girl. 

Rocky’s heart is in the right place. Even with everything I know and believe now, which includes the firm conviction that a random neighborhood dude has absolutely no right to tell a young girl who is not his daughter how to dress or speak or behave, I know that he’s honestly concerned about Marie. In 1970s Philadelphia, foul-mouthed, late-night-wandering, careless young girls end up with a bad reputation, at the very least. 

When Rocky tells young Marie to watch her mouth, to try to act less trampy and more ladylike, and to avoid being seen with the neighborhood hooligans, he’s trying to protect her. He knows that a bad reputation, once earned, is almost impossible for a young girl to shed. He knows that a girl who wants a nice boyfriend and eventually a nice husband cannot be the type of girl who puts out, or who is even thought to put out, or who is thought to even think about putting out. He knows these things because he’s a man and he knows how he himself treats women of the right sort and women of the wrong sort. 

So yes, I suppose that Rocky’s heart is in the right place, and I love him for walking Marie home and making sure she gets safely inside. But I love Marie even more for telling Rocky to go fuck himself, just as she shuts the door in his face. At that age, I didn’t know how to handle the many men and boys in my neighborhood who all felt that it was their duty and their right to tell every girl how much or how sincerely we should smile, or how much or little makeup we should wear, or how we should walk or speak or laugh so as to be attractive to men but not too-attractive-if-you-know-what-I-mean and we did, thank you very much. I wish I’d known then that a polite but firm “fuck off” or variation thereof was the only reasonable response to such unsolicited instruction. 

*****

Did you think that this post was going to be about a movie? No, it’s actually about a book; Caitlin Flanagan’s Girl Land, a collection of essays about mid-20th century American girlhood 

I first read Caitlin Flanagan in 2006 or so. One of her Atlantic essays went viral (which at that time meant that people emailed it around to all of their friends, who emailed it to other friends). I read the essay, and then immediately went and bought the hardcover edition of To Hell With All That, Flanagan’s collection of essays on women and housekeeping and motherhood. 

The essay, of course, was the infamous “How Serfdom Saved the Women’s Movement,” which earned Caitlin Flanagan a shit-ton of grief from working women and feminists. I just re-read that essay and I have to believe that most of the people who blasted it as a mean-spirited polemic against women in the workforce didn’t actually read it. Instead, they read the most inflammatory out-of-context quotes that circulated on the internet until everyone was sure that Caitlin Flanagan was a woman-hating Phyllis Schlafly wannabe. 

Having actually read “Serfdom,” I know that it is not at all an attack against women who work. Rather, it’s a criticism of women who take advantage of other women who work, by paying them low hourly under-the-table wages to serve as nannies and housekeepers. This is still a problem. Housekeepers and nannies, sometimes undocumented, sometimes legal, but almost always poor, are often underpaid, deprived of paid time off and medical benefits, and hired and paid without the paperwork that would make them eligible for Social Security and other government benefits. If they are hurt on the job, they’re not eligible for Worker’s Compensation. They don’t get paid holidays or voting leave or jury duty leave. If they’re undocumented, then they don’t even have any recourse if their employers fail to pay them. Caitlin Flanagan wasn’t attacking women who work in highly paid professions; she was pleading for fairness and equity for the women who do the work that makes it possible for professional and executive women to succeed. Things have changed since 2006, and I suspect that readers today would react differently to this essay than they did 15 years ago. Caitlin Flanagan was right. 

*****

A few years after I read To Hell with All That, another old Flanagan essay also made its rounds on the internet. “Are You There God? It’s Me, Monica” examined an apparent panic about an apparent oral sex craze among very young adolescents. I say “apparent” because Flanagan begins the essay by admitting that she had initially scoffed at rumors about middle school blow job parties, and because I had young children at the time so I wasn’t tuned in to teen and tween culture. The online discussion of this essay in 2010 or so, when I first heard about it, suggested that Flanagan herself was part of an hysterical pearl-clutching mob of middle-aged suburban ladies, aghast at the behavior of these young trollops. 

I kept meaning to read the essay for myself, but I never got around to it until just last week, when I read Girl Land, which includes a chapter based on “Are You There God?” And what do you know? Just as with “Serfdom,” the online haters had completely misrepresented the essay, and Flanagan’s point. That’s what you get when you read about what an author has written, rather than reading the author’s actual words. 

*****

But didn’t I say that I was going to write about a book? I think I did. Girl Land is about girlhood of a very different sort than Rocky’s young friend Marie and I lived through in inner-city Philadelphia in the 1970s and 1980s. Caitlin Flanagan’s girls are nicely brought-up upper middle class American girls, girls who are “cosseted,” “cherished,” “treasured,” “protected,” “sheltered,” “tended,” and “watched over” by their families. Flanagan and I are rough contemporaries. A Google search tells me that she was born in 1961, so she’s four years older than I am. And I get all of her cultural references, from Judy Blume to Patty Hearst. But I grew up in a working-class family, and so my experience of girlhood was very different from Caitlin Flanagan's.  

Working-class girls in Philadelphia in the 1970s and 1980s were definitely protected and watched very closely, but we were not cosseted, treasured, cherished, or indulged in any way. Nor were we sheltered. We knew exactly what could happen to girls who stepped out of line. Everyone we came in contact with all day long, from our teachers to our parents to our aunts and uncles to the random dude on the street took special pains to tell us, frequently, what could happen to bad girls, and we were expected to listen patiently to their well-meaning advice. And we had to accept, without complaining, that boys--even our younger brothers--could do what they wanted, go where they wanted, without fear. 

For the boys in our blue-collar Catholic neighborhood, things were pretty straightforward (definitely not easy, but straightforward). Life was more complicated for the girls. We had to watch ourselves, to make sure that boys understood the limits. But we weren’t to come across as standoffish or snooty. We had to act like ladies, but not like stuck-up prigs, because what did we think this was, the Main Line? We had to dress in a way that was feminine, but not prissy, but also definitely not slutty. We had to smile, but in exactly the right way. Too broad and open a smile might be taken as an invitation, and you don’t want to look like you’re asking for it, do you? Too stiff and formal a smile, and you might come across as prudish or stuck-up, and who do you think you are, Grace Kelly? (I grew up two miles and a million light years from Grace Kelly’s childhood home.) There was only one way for us to dress, speak, and act that would meet with adult approval. 

Here’s the easiest way to explain it. Picture if you will a big Venn diagram. The slutty girls occupied the circle on the left; and the girls who acted like nuns (or librarians, or old ladies, or lesbians), belonged on the right. The very, very small intersection between the two circles was where you needed to be. It wasn’t that hard to get into that little intersection. It wasn’t hard at all, in fact. The hard part was staying there. And once you were out, there was no getting back in. 

But that’s neither here nor there. I don’t fault Caitlin Flanagan for focusing on her own segment of upper middle-class white American girlhood. That’s her world; or at least, it was. Writers are supposed to write about what they know. I couldn’t have written Girl Land just as Caitlin Flanagan wrote it, but I understood and related to every word. The transition from girlhood to womanhood is universal.

*****

In the essay “Dating,” Flanagan writes about her high school near-rape experience. I say “her” high school near-rape experience, not “a” high school near-rape experience, because everyone I know had at least one. 

A few days ago, I was in the grocery store shopping for my old lady, and I heard Kajagoogoo’s “Too Shy.” I hadn’t heard that song in a long time. I wondered how many other women my age (Class of 1983) hear that song and think of it as I do, as music to be held down to while a boy gropes you against your will. I don’t have hard data or anything, but I feel confident in my assertion that just about every girl who graduated from high school in the 1980s had at least one near-rape experience, with or without a soundtrack. Some women have a hard time getting over these experiences. Maybe they suffer in silence for years until their attacker is nominated to the Supreme Court, and then they speak out, upending their lives in the process. But most of us are completely cavalier, even lighthearted, about what we euphemistically describe as “bad experiences.” “Oh yeah,” we say, “I had a bad experience, too. I was at the movies/in a car/at the prom/at an after-prom party/on a beach trip/at an amusement park/going bowling/going rollerskating with my boyfriend/friend/friend’s older brother/older brother’s friend and he tried to attack me. And then we watched the rest of the movie, and we went home.” We didn’t talk about these things at the time. No one would have believed us; or if they did, it would have been our fault. It was always the girl’s fault. 

And as Girl Land makes clear, it wasn’t only working class girls who had “bad experiences.” Cosseted and treasured upper middle class girls had bad experiences, too. After I read “Dating,”  I thought about how I don’t know a single woman of any social class who wouldn’t recognize Flanagan’s wide-eyed naivete, going off for an afternoon at a secluded beach with a sweet, handsome, funny teenage boy; and then her growing panic as she realized that this adorable boy was about to try to rape her. We’re all women, and we all know that none of us, not even well brought-up upper middle class girls, cosseted and treasured and cherished and protected, are immune. 

*****

Girl Land, as Flanagan writes, is a place that girls must pass through on their way to womanhood. The journey is fraught and often perilous, and none of us, no matter where we’re from or what our families are like, gets out unscathed. And in some ways, it’s even harder now. My childhood was nothing like Caitlin Flanagan’s, but we had something in common, a great blessing that made adolescence much easier than it is for today’s girls. 

I didn’t spend my afternoons dreaming and reading and diary-writing in a pink and white bedroom filled with floral comforters and stuffed animals and posters, but I could still escape from the world and be myself for a few minutes without worrying about what the popular girls thought about my clothes and hair or about what the opinionated men and boys of the neighborhood thought about my deportment and my proper place on the Venn diagram. Girls today, immersed in social media for 24 hours a day, have no such respite. Girl Land was never an easy place to be, but it’s a minefield now. It’s a fucking minefield.

I am the mother of boys, but reading Girl Land made me want to take care of girls; to tell them that everything will be OK one day. And to let them know that sometimes, you need to close the front door on the judgers and the haters and the well-meaning neighborhood prize fighters. Sometimes, you need to tell them all to just fuck off. 



Sunday, May 9, 2021

Mother's Day

OMG, I’m almost finished with a piece of writing that has been dogging me--DOGGING me, I tell you--for weeks, and it’s quite a relief. Watch this space! Coming soon! Don’t miss it!

But every silver lining has a heavy gray cloud because just when I thought that we were close to a resolution to the impasse that I mentioned last week, it turns out that not only do we not have a resolution but that some people appear to have dug in more firmly. I’m looking across no-man’s-land right now and I see sandbags. I see barbed wire. I see gun turrets. 

*****

It’s Friday now. We appear once again to have achieved a peace settlement or at least a cease-fire, so I can go about my business without a flak jacket or whatever the fuck else. 

I’m still very close to finishing the essay I’ve been writing; so close, in fact, that I can sit around her writing about writing it rather than actually writing it. It’s all part of the process. 

What I’m writing is an essay about Caitlin Flanagan’s Girl Land. Flanagan just published an essay on The Atlantic, about “Nomadland” (the movie) and she picked up something that I missed entirely because she’s Caitlin Flanagan and I’m not. Or rather, I did pick it up, but I didn’t quite get what I was seeing. Frances McDormand’s Fern and Linda May (played by herself) are living a very particular part of every young girl’s dream life; the part where we play house and pretend that we are mistresses of all we survey. The makeshift nature of a little girl’s playhouse is part of its charm, a feature and not a bug. Fern and Linda get to run their tiny mobile households all for themselves, just as they like them, with no demands from husbands or children and no neighborhood standards to live up to. As they sit together in their lawn chairs, Flanagan observes, Fern and Linda May are no longer beaten-down, overworked elderly blue-collar women. They are girls; little girls with their whole lives ahead of them, mistresses of all they survey.  

*****

Do you see why it takes me so damn long to finish anything? Last night, I re-read what I have so far, and I found a few easy edits that will make it all flow so much better. But why not write about revising rather than actually revising? 

*****

Now it's Sunday. Yesterday, we went to a cookout. I don’t really know the couple who hosted the party; they’re acquaintances rather than friends. They have a magazine-perfect house and deck and yard that I just slightly envied. So much room, I thought, and such nice outdoor furniture. It was unseasonably cold yesterday, but propane heaters threw warmth in every direction, and colorful flowers bloomed from planters and flower beds.

I don’t generally envy other people’s material wealth and possessions. I have enough. And later as I read Lauren Hough’s Leaving Isn’t the Hardest Thing, I remembered that I have enough, even if I’d forgotten it for five minutes while I basked in the propane-generated outdoor warmth. 

Later, I did go back and revise my essay, and I’m this close. This close, I tell you. It’s 9:45 on Sunday morning and I just ate some eggs and fruit salad that I didn’t have to make, and I’m sitting on the couch, half-watching a “Hunger Games” marathon while reading and writing. I don’t know how appropriate “The Hunger Games” is as Mother’s Day programming, but I happen to love the movies (and the books) so I’m quite content. I have a whole day ahead of me when I don’t have to work or cook or clean or fight the power or adhere to anyone’s timetable. That’s all I want for Mother’s Day. 


Monday, March 29, 2021

Nomadland and "Nomadland" (SPOILERS AHEAD--Don't say you weren't warned!)

When I was young, meaning 10 or so, I began to worry about how people survived in the world. Yes, that was me, Little Miss Sunshine, skipping merrily along through my carefree, happy childhood. Age 10 or so was when I came to realize that adults had to work every day, AND that no one’s job was safe. People could lose their jobs or their money at any time, through their own fault or through the caprice of forces beyond their control. This was a sobering realization. It didn’t seem fair that people could be thrown into poverty for any reason or no reason, and that a person or a family might go hungry just because the economy no longer needed a certain set of skills or because a person made a mistake or grew too old or sick to work. Like all ten-year-olds, I was preoccupied with fairness, and this seemed very unfair. More than unfair, it seemed cruel. It still seems cruel. 

This was what I thought about as I read Jessica Bruder’s Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century. I saw the movie first. “Surviving America” might seem hyperbolic or inflammatory to a settled middle-class American raised on the myth that all you have to do is work hard and do the right thing and be a solid citizen, and you’ll be rewarded with a dignified and comfortable life. But for most of us who do enjoy a middle-class life with a house and a car and decent healthcare and Wi-Fi and easy access to consumer goods, good luck is a big component of our so-called success. I work for a living, and so does my husband. We both work pretty hard, actually. But even the most casual observation of the last 20 years or so of American life makes clear that hard work is no guarantee at all that we will stay as secure and comfortable as we are. One lost contract, one serious illness, one bad investment, and the whole operation could fall to pieces. 

*****

Nomadland's true-life nomads live in RVs, trailers, vans, and even cars. Like the itinerant farm workers of John Steinbeck’s Depression novels, they wander from job to job, spending the summer working as campsite hosts in national parks, and the fall months working 10-hour shifts in Amazon warehouses. They harvest sugar beets and they operate rides at carnivals and amusement parks. They prefer the term “houseless” to “homeless.” One of Bruder’s nomads is a man named Bob Wells, who created a website that teaches people how to live in a vehicle. He considers vehicle-dwelling as both a lifeboat  for those who slip through the cracks of middle-class security, and a form of rebellion against middle-class norms. Rather than think of themselves as homeless vagrants, Bruder writes, nomads become “conscientious objectors to the system that had failed them.” 

Wells likens the illusion of middle-class security to “The Matrix,” explaining that people on his side of the illusion, the people who fell out of the middle class, have suffered a “radical pounding,” an event that opened their eyes and forced them to abandon the illusion and accept the reality that most of us don’t want to accept, that we’re all just one big medical bill or one lost job away from losing what we think of as our place in the world. “At one time,” he says, “there was a social contract that if you played by the rules...everything would be fine. That’s no longer true today. You can do everything right...and still end up broke, alone, and homeless.” For most of us, Wells points out, downward mobility is now just as likely as upward mobility. 

*****

A determined, resolute optimism is characteristic of the nomad, vehicle-dwelling subculture. Many of the people Bruder writes about are relentlessly upbeat, afraid that if they drop the smiling veneer, they will become objects of pity. Media coverage of people who live this way tends to stick to this script, too. As Bruder writes, articles and broadcasts on nomad workers, or “workampers” makes “workamping sound like a sunny lifestyle, or even a quirky hobby, rather than a survival strategy.” The nomads themselves like to perpetuate this image. Bruder writes of nomads who speak in “cheery platitudes” when describing their very difficult lives. They urge her not to write about them as “Americans in crisis,” and they are proud of their “no whiners” ethic. 

*****

Among Nomadland’s real-life characters, Linda May is the most prominently featured and the most endearing. Linda May has been through some things. She spent a good part of her early and middle adulthood doing what she was supposed to do; going to work and taking care of her home and her family and paying her bills. And then a series of misfortunes forced her to move in with her adult children, who were also struggling to pay their bills. And then she decided to buy a mobile home and hit the road. A veteran of Amazon warehouse work, sugar beet harvesting, and camp hosting (among other jobs), she is the exemplar of the workamper lifestyle, and of its smiling, no-nonsense, no-complaining philosophy. In her case, the cheerfulness is not forced or faked. She is a naturally optimistic and resilient person, perhaps as ideally suited to life as a nomad as anyone can be. But reading between the lines, it’s clear that this life is hard even for a hardy soul like Linda May. 

*****

Every time I read a memoir or a true-life story, I imagine myself living that life. Everyone does that, right? Well, I do. And I know without even thinking hard that I wouldn’t last one day on the road with Linda May and Swankie Wheels and Bob Wells. It’s not the lack of material comforts that would bother me so much. I do enjoy comforts and luxuries, but I think that I could live, and pretty happily, without lots of the material comforts and things that I have. It’s the moving from place to place, and the driving a heavy and unwieldy vehicle through rough desert terrain and up and down treacherous mountain roads, and the unexpected breakdowns and flat tires that would do me in. And then there’s the work. Don’t get me started about the work. I know my physical limitations, and I’m pretty sure that a week working in an Amazon fulfillment center or harvesting sugar beets would just about kill me. And I’m not as old as Linda or Swankie. Respect. 

**** 

Like lots of other fortunate, employed, middle-class people, I spent a lot of money during the pandemic. In my defense, I donated a lot of money, too--about $5,000 so far, to food banks and diaper banks and disaster relief and other emergency causes. But I also bought a lot of unnecessary handbags, and a ton of clothes to wear to places where I no longer go, and a lot of books, and another streaming service subscription. 

I thought about all of these things, the momentary enjoyment of opening the packages and looking at my new purchases, as I read about Linda May and all of the other nomads who thought that they were fine, money-wise, until a combination of events and circumstances left them near-destitute, near-homeless, near-the-edge-of-the-proverbial cliff. Many of the itinerants whose stories appear in Nomadland thought that they were on solid middle-class American-dream ground, and that the lives that they took for granted were secure, and that homelessness and poverty were things that happened to other, less careful people. And then they found themselves on the street; or on the road, as it were, working long and physically exhausting hours for low pay. It could and did happen to them. It could happen to anyone. It could happen to me. 

*****

For five minutes after I finished reading Nomadland, I thought “that’s it. No more spending. No more takeout food, and no more books that don’t come from the library, and no more jackets, and absolutely no gosh-dang handbags ever again.” And I knew that this resolve would last no more than a week, because I know myself better than that. But I also looked around my house, my cheerful, colorful, but slightly shabby old house, and I decided that the worn-out family room couch has at least another five years of useful life, and the ugly-but-serviceable tile in the master bathroom is just fine, and the old-fashioned not-at-all modern kitchen is still a perfectly good place to store, cook, and eat food and so it’s all going to stay just the way it is for the foreseeable future. 

And I’m also going to think twice before I buy unnecessary stuff, and not just because I don’t want to spend myself into penury. It’s because there’s too much stuff; not just here in my house, but in the world. And there’s a huge human cost to producing and shipping and storing and selling and delivering all of that stuff to people like me. And because what do I do with all of that stuff if things hit the fan, and I have to hit the road or move myself and my family into a tiny apartment? We could have an estate sale, I suppose, but there’s no guarantee that anyone else would want all of our stuff. And sometimes, when I look in a closet or a drawer, it all feels like a burden. It feels like we’re carrying all of this stuff with us, all the time, even when we’re not home. And it’s heavy. 

*****

Nomadland the book and “Nomadland” the movie are very different, and it almost doesn’t matter if you read the book first or watch the movie first and read the book afterward, as I did. Oh, but HUGE SPOILER ALERT if you haven’t watched the movie: 

SWANKIE DIDN’T ACTUALLY DIE! The book came out several years before the movie was made, of course, and I thought that perhaps Swankie had become ill during the filming, and that the producers wrote her death into the story. But this event was fictional. 

Even though many of the characters (including Swankie, Bob Wells, and Linda May,) are real people, played by themselves, much of the movie is fictionalized, including Frances McDormand’s entire character, Fern; and Fern’s sort-of boyfriend, played by David Strathairn. I don’t think the movie would have worked as well otherwise. I suppose it could have been a documentary, and Linda May and Swankie Wheels are more than engaging enough to center a whole movie around, but the addition of fictional characters allowed the filmmakers to tell the story as the story of a life and not the story of a lifestyle. Does that make sense? It’s the best I can do, other than to advise everyone to watch “Nomadland,” the most beautiful movie I’ve seen in a long time, and to read the book, and to think about the people who pack our Amazon orders and harvest our food and work seasonal jobs at resorts and amusement parks and ski resorts, and who deserve a decent paycheck and a decent place to live, whether it's stationary or mobile. 


Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Books and Pictures: 2020 Bibliography

I made a rash commitment to finish my book list over the three-day MLK weekend. And then all of a sudden the MLK weekend was here and gone, and as the next three-day weekend approached, I still was not finished. I always forget how much work this is. I write about some books right after I read them, and then I have to search my blog and my Google Docs folder to find what I wrote. That’s easy enough. What’s not easy is to remember what I thought about the books that I read but didn’t write about during the year. Thank God this isn’t my actual paid job. 

I wrote that paragraph well over a week ago. Now two people in my house have COVID, and the other two of us can’t go anywhere--I mean even more than we couldn’t go anywhere before. Being nearly totally housebound drove me to get this done so I can waste your time with my inane observations about things other than books. I spent a few days updating the blog with posts about specific books and authors, which I am linking to here, so that this list won’t be quite so God-awful long and meandering. I do try to be helpful.

Anyway, in very approximate chronological order according to my now very messy handwritten list, here are the books I read in 2020. 

*****

The Little Friend (Donna Tartt). This was my 2020 - 2021 overlap book. I wrote about it here

*****

Working (Studs Terkel). Working, which made Studs Terkel famous when it was published in 1974, is a series of stories narrated in the first person by a huge collection of people spanning a pretty big variety of professions, social classes, and education levels. Its full title is Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do. That title is exactly right. Terkel adds short introductions of each subject, and occasionally adds his own comments and observations; but most of the book is people talking about their work and how they feel about it. Their voices come through very clearly. 

Here’s a question: What makes a job a good job? Pay, hours, working conditions, title, commute, benefits--all of those things are important. But Working makes clear that the work itself is the most important thing. If the work isn’t interesting or if the person doing the job doesn’t see its value to the world, then it almost doesn’t matter how much it pays, or how prestigious it is, or how pleasant the working conditions are. We have an innate need for meaning in our work. As one of Terkel’s subjects says, "That's the difference between being alive and being dead." 

*****

How to Ruin Everything (George Watsky). Certain smarmy younger people, including one to whom I actually gave birth, have expressed surprise that I read this book. I see no reason why this should be surprising. I hope Mr. Watsky writes more books. And I hope some millennial or Gen Z-er stumbles across this blog post and finds it hilarious that I refer to him as Mr. Watsky. 

The Best of Marlys (Lynda Barry). This is an anthology of Ernie Pook’s Comeek, one of the best comic strips ever. Last year, I bought Making Comics, and it made me remember how much I loved Lynda Barry, so I bought this best-of directly from the publisher, Drawn and Quarterly. I didn’t read it all the way through in 2020, so maybe it shouldn’t be on my list, but I’m counting it anyway because I’m pretty sure that I read most of these strips when they were originally published. When I was in my early 20s, my friend and I used to cut these out of the Philadelphia City Paper and mail them to each other, even though we lived in the same town and saw each other at least once a week. I found a few of them among my old letters when I was cleaning out cabinets. It was a different time, but Ernie Pook’s Comeek holds up. 

Does this picture make you hungry
 for a fried-baloney sandwich?

*****

The Princess Diarist (Carrie Fisher). I loved Carrie as an actress, but I love her even more as a writer. This is the book in which she famously revealed the long-suspected affair with Harrison Ford, who appears to have been a bit of a jerk. She shares long entries from her 1976 journal (she was 19 at the time), and they are astonishingly good. I write every day, but when I read writing that’s so effortlessly beautiful and incisive, I wonder why I bother. But then I go back and read some of my own work, and I know why. It’s because I’m good at this. So was Carrie Fisher. God rest her soul. 

*****

Sally Rooney:

  • Conversations with Friends
  • Normal People

For some reason, it is now fashionable on the Internet to talk about how overrated Sally Rooney is, and how ordinary and dull her two novels are. Disregard all of this talk when you come across it because Sally Rooney is a wonderful writer, and Normal People and Conversations with Friends are both beautiful books. I wrote about Conversations with Friends early last year, but I never got around to writing about Normal People. It’s not very long; or maybe it is but it didn’t seem long because of two things: I read it just after I finished Ron Chernow’s Hamilton, also wonderful, but VERY long. And because it’s so good that I didn’t want it to end, but it did end despite my best efforts to ration the last few pages so that I wouldn’t finish it too quickly. 

Normal People gets so many things right, but if I had to pick just one thing, it would be the beauty and pain and loneliness of a young person’s first time away from home; especially a certain kind of introspective young person, and really especially the kind of young person who doesn’t always understand the social signals in a new environment. I was nowhere near as bright or as sensitive as Normal People's Marianne or Connell; and I grew up in a place and time quite different from Ireland in 2011, but I was very much like Connell in one way. I was the child of an unsophisticated working-class family who encountered worldly, cultured, well-educated people for the first time when I went to college. Like Connell, I didn’t know how to fit in with them; and then later, I didn’t know if I even wanted to. Like both Marianne and Connell, I experienced real loneliness and depression for the first time as a young adult. And like both of them, I learned that “life offers up these moments of joy despite everything.” It still does. 

*****

Loving My Actual Life: An Experiment in Relishing What’s Right in Front of Me (Alexandra Kuykendall). I know that I read this because it’s on my list. If I’d especially loved or especially hated it, I’d have written something about it. Anyway, the message is right there in the title, and it’s a good one. 

Happens Every Day (Isabel Gillies). Early pandemic reading. I wrote about this one right here. I might read it again. It’s very good. 

The Reading Life (C.S. Lewis)

The Hope of the Gospel (George MacDonald). George MacDonald had been on my to-read list for a long time, so I’m glad I finally got around to reading him. Now I don’t have to feel guilty every time I read C.S. Lewis, who urged everyone to read George MacDonald. He was right.  

Things We Didn’t Talk About When I Was a Girl (Jeannie Vanasco)

Goodbye to Berlin (Christopher Isherwood)

*****

Hilary Mantel: 

  • Wolf Hall
  • Bring Up the Bodies
  • The Mirror and the Light
  • Giving Up the Ghost
  • Eight Months on Ghazzah Street
  • Mantel Pieces

Hilary Mantel was my author of the year for 2020

*****

Not That Kind of Girl (Lena Dunham). I wrote this down, so I suppose I read it. IDK why. I guess I wanted to catch up with what young women were thinking about five years ago. 

*****

Helene Hanff:

  • 84, Charing Cross Road
  • The Duchess of Bloomsbury
  • Underfoot in Show Business 
Anne Bancroft and Anthony Hopkins as Helene Hanff and Frank Doel in the
1987 movie version of 84, Charing Cross Road. It almost doesn't matter if you
see the movie first and then read the book or vice versa. 


*****

Your Blue Flame (Jennifer Fulwiler). I like Jennifer Fulwiler, and it’s hard not to admire a woman who decides that she needs to go on tour as a stand-up comedian, and then just does it, successfully, on her own, with no backing or support from the entertainment establishment. I don’t remember much about this book other than the general premise, which is that you should find the thing that you’re meant to do--your blue flame--and then just do it and don’t let anyone stand in your way. To which I say, absolutely. Sure. Why not. You go, girl. Get it. Get after it. Crush it. Kill it. Slay.  

*****

Meg Wolitzer:

  • This is My Life
  • The Wife
  • The Interestings 
*****

The Rent Collector (Camron Wright). A friend recommended this to me, and I read it, and then I felt bad about myself because I did not find the story as moving and inspiring as I was supposed to. What the hell is wrong with me? 

*****

The Life of Elizabeth I (Alison Weir) and Mary Tudor, England’s First Queen (Anna Whitelock). It was a year full of Tudors.  

Always a bad relationship choice. He only killed two of his six wives, but that's 33 percent.
Are are those odds that you want to mess with? 


*****

Hamilton (Ron Chernow). I can’t be the only person who saw the musical first and then read the book. Among many things for which I will remember 2020, some good, and most bad, Hamilton is among the very good. 

The Man Without a Face (Masha Gessen). I didn’t need any more proof that Vladimir Putin is a bad, bad man, but thanks to this book, I know that he’s even worse than I thought he was.  

Look Alive Out There (Sloane Crosley). What did I think about this book? I read it many months ago and I only remember two essays. One is about the author’s housesitting stay in an isolated mountain home in California; so isolated that when the homeowner is delayed by a few days, Crosley has to befriend the neighbors in the hope that they’ll invite her to dinner, because there’s no more food in the house and the nearest store is 20 miles away. And of course, she doesn’t have a car. Fortunately, the neighbors are friendly and they invite her to dinner. In fact, they’re too friendly, and it gets weird. The other one was about Crosley’s unsuccessful attempt to climb Cotopaxi. Well, she did climb it, but didn’t make the summit. She gets credit for trying. I wouldn’t have made it to base camp, whatever that is. But I don’t know that she gets credit for this book. I came away from it with no real idea of who Sloane Crosley is. And that’s her prerogative, of course, but I feel that a book of personal essays should reveal a little bit more about the person who wrote them. That’s just me. 

*****

P.D. James

  • Time to Be in Earnest 
  • The Children of Men 

P.D. James was one of my four favorite author discoveries of 2020. I wrote about Time to Be in Earnest here (and I’m still cracking up about my dolla dolla bills joke). Then I read The Children of Men. Time to Be in Earnest was my first P.D. James, but it's probably not the best exemplar of her work because it's a memoir, and she was actually a novelist. I think I need to read some of her detective novels, which is what she is best known for. The Children of Men, though technically called a novel, is really a morality tale disguised as a novel. And it’s a very good morality tale, with a relevant and urgent message; and it’s full of beautiful writing. But it’s not really a novel. That’s what I think, anyway. What do I know? 

OK, here’s what I know--it’s very rare for me to prefer a movie to the book that inspired it, and this is one of those rare cases. "Children of Men," the 2006 movie version, is great, and very different from the novel, though I read that P.D. James liked the movie version very much. Anyway, a book about the impending end of the world was either entirely appropriate 2020 reading, or very inappropriate, depending on your mood. I will be seeking out additional P.D. James, but probably not until 2022 or so. 

*****

Things I Want to Punch in the Face (Jennifer Worick). This book was among the many, many things I wanted to punch in the face in 2020. But whose fault is that? I'm the one who chose to pick up a book titled Things I Want to Punch in the Face; and then having picked it up, chose to actually read it. Maybe I should punch myself in the face. 

Crazy Salad and Scribble Scrabble (Nora Ephron)

How to Be an Antiracist (Ibram X. Kendi)

*****

Allie Brosh:

  • Hyperbole and a Half 
  • Solutions and Other Problems
*****
I just re-read the introductory paragraphs for this very long hot mess of a post (but seriously--can you imagine how much longer it'd have been had I not broken it into smaller posts?) and I see that I mentioned that this list was in "approximate" chronological order. Approximate indeed. I read the first Allie Brosh book in May or so, and then the second one in November (I think that's when it came out). I read How to Be an Antiracist in June or July. I read the face-punching book sometime during the early days of the 'rona, when I thought that we'd be out of lockdown in a matter of weeks and I didn't have a care in the world. Really, this list is in no real order whatsoever, much like the inside of my brain. I'm reading and writing again in 2021 and the one thing that I can promise is that next year's list will probably be just as crazy as this one. As always, don't say you weren't warned.